Key Principles. The goal of Activity Theory is to define the relation between the artifacts or tools, others and the circumstances under which an activity that is purposeful is undertaken to attain the desired or intended outcome. Context, Consciousness and Activity are the same. Activity Theory was developed from Marxist philosophy (Wertsch, 1981) and also in the research of Soviet psychologists during the 1930s, 1920s.

Activity Theory posits that consciousness as well as context and activity are one in the same. The creators of the theory, like A. Instead of having a context to an activity, it is the activity that is the context in which participants act in a conscious manner. N. In terms of application, this would suggest you are an active theorist, for instance, could claim that one can’t design software for computers that is based on a specific concept of the user since the designer’s intention and the user’s consciousness will affect the system. Leont’ev and Lev Vygotsky, believed that psychoanalysis and behaviorism were insufficient methods of psychology, and relied upon Marx’s critique of social theories. According to some activity theorists it is believed that the mind is a product of certain activities , and their interactions with the subject and the object (McAvinia in 2016). Luria and Leont’ev proposed the idea of object-oriented and artifact-mediated action (CRADLE CRADLE, 2011) and rejected the idea that behavioral actions are reactions to stimuli (McAvinia McAvinia, 2016). Externalization and Internalization.

According to Vygotsky that learning is social and children learn to comprehend the world by interacting with it, as well as through the creation of artifacts. In the activity theory the human brain isn’t separate from, impartial, or detached from the activity. Based on the equation of consciousness and action, Vygotsky (1978) suggested that the construction and use of and creation of artifacts are a an aspect of human development and that through doing things that stimulate the mind, it can develop. However, people or subjects discuss how they conduct themselves and the activities they undertake. First Generation Activity Theory. As people come to comprehend the world through their actions in accordance with Vygotsky’s views people internalize their understanding.

The theory of activity, originally developed by Vygotsky is based on three fundamental concepts, which can be modeled as three nodes: human beings employ tools to attain the goal of. In the future, an individual may externalize this knowledge in order to carry out an entirely new thing. The goal is the reason to the activity and the process is controlled by one or more artifacts that can be referred to as instruments, tools, or technologies. When individuals utilize mediating artifacts they are able to know the way these mediating artifacts function in a particular action. The process of a person working towards an object by using an artifact results in an result.

In turn, they may develop innovative objects (online education and use). The result could be identical or different from the object, or sometimes, it could be unintentional or even undesirable. Engestrom and Miettinen discuss internalization in relation in the process of reproduction, while externalization refers to the making of new artifacts, which makes the process of transformation possible.

Second Generation Activity Theory. So, in Engestrom and Miettinen’s views the two processes are interdependent (1999). Leont’ev widened Vygotsky’s model for activity theory to include the socially-mediated nature of the activity as well as the roles played by others cheap involved in the process into consideration. Activities are Object-Oriented , and lead to an end. Leont’ev suggested that the activities are influenced by the distribution of work between people. As per Activity Theory, humans have intentions that are recognized by their cognition. In contrast, Vygotsky identified activity as an the act of a person that is mediated by signs and tools of culture (Engestrom and Miettinen, 1999′ McAvinia, 2016), Activities differ from other activities because they possess some kind of subject (Issroff and Scanlon, 2002).

Leont’ev expanded this definition to examine how this activity relates to an individual’s position in the larger group. This is what drives the action while the process focuses on making the object the result. This is why the Leontyev version of the theory of activity had many distinct nodes: the individual mediating artifact, community, object rules, and distribution of work. In essence, when people create, learn or sell their products, they do not only create, study, selling something but also their "dreams feelings, emotions, and thoughts are also directed to things in our global world" (Kaptelinin Nardi and Nardi (2006)).

In addition, Leont’ev considered the unconscious or automatic aspects of the task and theorized that activities are made up of operations and actions. The change of an object to the final product, according to Davydov (1999) refers to an internal changethat is "making obvious its fundamental nature and changing the nature of it." As per Davydov, there are two kinds of transformation.

Categorie: Non classé


*


Du Blog

Partenaires

  • Suivez nous sur Facebook!
  • Un hébérgeur pas cher et paiement en Paypal
  • Hébergeur Offshore sous cPanel
  • Nous sommes aussi présent sur Twitter